Supporting
Evidence
Documented Examples and Source Sheet
Preamble
The Declaration is based on explicit, repeated, and verifiable public statements by Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Nick Fuentes to a combined audience of many millions. Below is a compilation of documented examples (with sources). This list is not nearly exhaustive but illustrates the consistent pattern.
In the Name of Jesus
They do not merely spread falsehoods despite their Christianity; they claim to do so because of it. To them, it is a Christian duty, framing antisemitism as spiritual courage while casting the defense of the Jewish people as a betrayal of the faith.
Owens: "Christ is king." "Christ will win." "I'm promoting Christ." Carlson: “That's non-Christian. That's totally incompatible with Christianity. … it's against my Christian faith … I'm offended by that as a Christian.” Fuentes: “Christ is King." "We've got to make America a Christian nation again." "Jews have no place in Western civilization because they are not Christian."
A Spectrum of Explicitness
The delivery of this message operates on a spectrum. While Fuentes is overt, Tucker Carlson employs a more circumspect strategy—rarely stating the conclusion explicitly, but providing the permission for it to be drawn. This dynamic was most clearly exposed when Carlson conducted a sympathetic, "puff piece" interview with Fuentes—America’s most notorious white supremacist—treating his views not as hateful and to be challenged, but as valid conservative critique.
This strategy often relies on two key rhetorical shields to inject Jew-hatred into the mainstream while maintaining plausible deniability:
1. "Just Asking Questions": A tactic used to introduce baseless conspiracies without assuming the burden of proof. By framing historical revisionism as mere "inquiry," they cast any moral pushback as "censorship," thereby protecting the lie under the guise of intellectual freedom.
2. "Just Noticing Things": A phrase (often referred to as "pattern recognition" by fellow travelers) used to signal theories about Jewish influence. It allows them to point to isolated anecdotes or demographics to imply a sinister, collective Jewish malice, while pretending to be merely observing neutral facts.
Definitions
for Context, Accuracy, and Clarity
“Jews” are an ethnic, religious, national identity and heritage. There are approximately 15 million Jews in the world today, and they are the historical continuation of the national identity described in the Bible.
“Judaism” is the historic, biblical faith and way of life of Jews.
“Israel” denotes the nation of the Jews, its ancestral homeland, and the only Jewish state in the modern world, home to about half of all Jews worldwide.
“Zionism” is the belief that, like other nations, the Jewish people have a legitimate right to national self-determination and independence in their ancestral homeland.
“Jew-hatred” (antisemitism) in its simplest form is the difference between claiming a specific Jew is a bad person, versus claiming that person is bad because they are Jewish. It is best defined by the internationally recognized standard, the IHRA Working Definition, which "lists contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere that could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
-
"Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
-
"Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
-
"Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
-
"Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
-
"Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
-
"Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
-
"Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
-
"Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
-
"Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
-
"Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
-
"Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel."
Examples
Legitimate Criticism: “I think billionaire George Soros’s funding of progressive district attorneys has endangered public safety. His progressive ideology is damaging our economy."
Antisemitic Example:
“George Soros is the Zionist puppet master behind a global plot to destroy the West. He and his Jewish cabal control the government and the media.”
This utilizes the "puppet master" trope and alleges a secret world Jewish conspiracy to control societal institutions (IHRA example 2). It shifts from criticizing his politics to demonizing him as part of a mythical Jewish, all-powerful collective.
Legitimate Criticism: "I think the Israeli Prime Minister’s choices are hurting democracy and could spark violent conflict. I think it’s unfair and I hope he is voted out of office.”
Antisemitic Example:
“Israel is a demonic Nazi-state that has no right to exist. This country has a bloodlust like no other. Everything they're doing is demonic.”
This holds all Israelis/Jews collectively guilty for the actions of the state and uses dehumanizing language ("bloodthirsty,” “demonic”) (IHRA example 11). It explicitly compares Israeli policy to that of the Nazis (IHRA example 10). It denies that, like other nations, the Jewish people have a legitimate right to national self-determination (IHRA example 7).
Candace Owens
Christian Political Commentator & Podcaster. Born 1989.
Once a celebrated voice in American conservatism, Candace Owens has transformed into the movement's most vocal proponent of explicit antisemitism. Unlike others who merely ask leading questions, Owens creates aggressive assertions: reviving medieval blood libels, labeling Israel a "demonic" and "cult" nation, and dismissing verified Holocaust history as "bizarre propaganda."
Commanding the #1 ranked podcast in the world as of late 2025, she possesses a uniquely dangerous influence. She actively mainstreams archaic anti-Jewish falsehoods by framing them as "Christian courage" and "truth-telling" to millions of followers. She is no longer just a political commentator; she is effectively catechizing a generation of Christians into confident, unrepentant hatred.
__
Candace Attack on Traditional Jews and the Talmud
"Christ is King. Christ is the King. ... Truly, Ben Shapiro, f*** you and the midget horse that you rode in on. And I say that on behalf of the world. ... You describe yourself as a Talmudic Jew. And I've learned what's in that Talmud. And I encourage other people at home to learn what's in that Talmud so that you know what Ben thinks of you, [Owens holds up August Rohling’s book] because he doesn't just hate me, he hates you, too, white man. He hates all black people. Okay? If he's following the rules of the Talmud, I mean when I say 'hate'—they think that we're animals. That they have a right to own us, that they have a right to make us worship them, that they have a right to lie to us, that they have a right to sue us and take everything that we have. That they have a right to deceive us."
Source: Candace Owens, "What Does Ben Shapiro Know About Erika Kirk And Fort Huachuca? | Candace Ep 283," Candace Owens, YouTube, December 19, 2025, https://youtube.com/live/w1oqQbR_bYs (accessed Jan 1, 2026).
Context: This statement resurrects the debunked distortions of August Rohling’s Der Talmudjude, a 19th-century polemic widely recognized by scholars and courts as a forgery relying on gross mistranslations. Candace promoted this debunked work on the same program. By presenting this discredited text as an authoritative source on Jewish belief, Owens engages in Demonization, utilizing historical propaganda tools that were later employed by the Nazi regime to frame Jews as an existential threat to humanity and justify their destruction. The claim that the Talmud mandates hatred and deception is a violation of the commandment against bearing false witness, as it propagates a malicious lie about the Jewish faith. Furthermore, God hates "one who sows discord among brothers"; using fabricated theology to incite racial and religious division is a sin that destroys community and violates the call to truth.
Holocaust Minimization and Historical Revisionism
"Some of the stories by the way sound completely absurd, like the idea they just like cut a human up and then sew them back together. Why would you do that, literally, even if you're the most evil person in the world? That's a tremendous waste of time and supply. Just slice a person in half and sew them together? That just sounds like bizarre propaganda. But let's just go with it. Let's say that that's actually true, okay, that experimentation is the thing that sets the Nazis apart."
Source: Candace Owens, "Literally Hitler. Why Can’t We Talk About Him? | Candace Ep 17," Candace Owens, YouTube, July 2, 2024, https://youtu.be/qhLXcvxdIyw (accessed January 13, 2026).
Context: This statement exemplifies the trope of trivializing the Holocaust by casting doubt on established historical facts and survivor testimonies, labeling them "bizarre propaganda." By using the argument from incredulity ("sound completely absurd"), the speaker attempts to dismantle the historical record of Nazi medical crimes, specifically the documented experiments of Josef Mengele, thereby rehabilitating the image of the perpetrators and minimizing the suffering of the victims. While some sensationalism surrounded Dr. Mengele, author Gerald Posner points out: “Candace Owens’ comments are despicable. I co-wrote the definitive bio[graphy] of Josef Mengele. The record of his crimes at Auschwitz—documented in survivor testimony, Allied & Soviet files, and trial records—defies denial or minimization. His crimes were unparalleled in their evil. I spent years in the archives and personally chronicled the accounts of survivors of his terror. Mengele's human experiments remain one of history's darkest records” (@geraldposner, X post, Aug 26, 2025). Owen's statements even caused a living survivor of Mengele’s horrors (Annetta Able) to speak out in protest. Owen bears false witness by dismissing the sworn testimonies of victims as "propaganda," violating the biblical command to speak truth and defend the voiceless.
Candace Owens on being chosen "Antisemite of the Year" 2024
"I wanted to take this seriously by putting together an acceptance speech. I wasn't expecting this or I would have gone shopping. I would've worn a dress, I would have invited family members and my friends to this. So this is sort of impromptu, but I did put together a couple of people that I do want to thank for this incredible feat, so I'll just get started here. I think, first and foremost, I want to thank the people who guided me here, the teachers who got me here."
Source: Candace Owens, "I WON. “Antisemite of the Year” | Candace Ep 121," Candace Owens, YouTube, December 16, 2024, https://youtu.be/_LOM-xbKkWs (accessed Jan 1, 2026).
Claiming Stalin was a Jew, Part of a Jewish Cabal, Mass Murdering Christians
“[Owens:] the media who, for a very long time, tried to convince us that Stalin and Vladimir Lenin were anti-Semitic. And then I learned, wait, Stalin was married to … [Tate:] Yes, they were literally a part of the Jewish cabal. And credit to you … [Owens:] I'm saying it, because I looked into it and I found a friend who understands Georgian. And they're like, everybody knows that Stalin was Jewish. And I'm like, Americans don't know this. … they were mass murdering Christians.”
Source: Candace Owens, "Tristan Tate x Candace Owens | Candace Ep 45," Candace, Apple Podcasts, Aug 14, 2024, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/candace/id1750591415?i=1000665339019 (accessed January 13, 2026).
Context: Owens followed up the podcast claim with an X post on Aug 15, “[Stalin's] real name was Josef djugashvilli. His entire cabinet. Guess what djugashvilli means in Georgian? What do you suppose moved he and Lenin to change their names? What were they hiding? Why do you believe so many Christians were mass murdered?”
Neither Vladimir Lenin nor Joseph Stalin were Jewish, debunking baseless theories that portray them as part of a "Jewish cabal." Stalin, born Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili, was Georgian from an Orthodox Christian family, studied at Tiflis Theological Seminary to become a priest before embracing Marxism as his ideology. There is no evidence of any Jewish heritage in Stalin's ancestry, as confirmed by Donald Rayfield, emeritus professor of Russian at Queen Mary University of London. His Georgian surname derives from Ossetian roots, with the etymology of “Jugha” unconnected to words meaning “Jewish”; though uncertain, it may mean slag from steelmaking, contrary to false claims that it signifies "son of a Jew."
Falsely labeling Stalin—the second-greatest mass murderer in history after Mao Zedong—as a Jew orchestrating the mass murder of Christians is an antisemitic fabrication aimed at stirring serious hatred against Jews.
Reviving of the Medieval Blood Libel (the myth that Jews consume Christian blood for ritual purposes on Passover)
“Catholics and Christians were going missing on Passover, and they would find bodies across Europe, and they were able to trace them back to Jews—blood libel! They weren’t Jews, okay? These were Frankists. And so just like Leo Frank killed Mary Phagan on Passover back in 1913 or 1914—I can’t remember the exact date—he did it during Passover for a reason. This Frankist cult, which is masquerading behind Jews, still participates in this s**t to this day, okay? … We are existing today in a Zionist media empire which is working to protect criminals. … Why would you want, as a small nation that is the size of New Jersey, why would you want the pedophiles to flee there? Why would you want the pedophiles to be procreating? Unless the Nation of Israel may have been established by some Frankists? It’s looking like Theodor Herzl’s family was from the exact same area in Moravia and in Bohemia where the Frankist cult was founded.”
“Most people don’t know. They think that the nation of Israel was established because of World War II. No. There was a lot going on leading up to that. Learn about the Damascus Affair of 1840. Learn about what happened to Eszter Solymosi in Austria in 1880. There were Christians who kept on going missing on holidays and the entire Christian world rose up and began publicizing, trying to point to what they believed to be a satanic cult. Of course, all of that’s been erased. Most Christians don’t know this.”
“There’s a lot behind my refusal, my absolute refusal, to bend the knee to Israel, as many American politicians have done. There’s too much I’ve learned about their [Israel’s? Jews’?] history, about what was done to Christians, which they’re alleging now is blood libel—that none of that’s real, it didn’t happen.”
Sources: Candace Owens, X post, Aug 17, 2024, https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/1824927083140616361 (accessed Jan 1, 2026). Dennis Prager's Letter to Candace Owens, Sep 3, 2024, https://www.prageru.com/dennis-pragers-letter-to-candace-owens (accessed Jan 16, 2026).
Context: This is a revival of the medieval Blood Libel (the myth that Jews consume Christian blood for ritual purposes on Passover), a classic antisemitic trope used to incite pogroms. It accuses Jews as a collective of "masquerading" to commit ritual murder. Even though Owens attempts to shift blame to "Frankists," she conflates them with Jewish history and explicitly links this "cult" to modern Israel ("Why would you want... pedophiles to flee there?").
Dennis Prager’s letter to Owens deals extensively with her accusations regarding Leo Frank, Mary Phagan, Frankists, pedophiles, etc. There were millions of Jews scattered around the relevant geography in Herzl’s time, where the Frankist cult had been a tiny minority a century before. Asserting that Herzl's Zionism led to a state founded by devotees of a satanic cult engaged in incest and ritual sex with children is a defamatory allegation requiring strong evidence. Vague suggestions like "may have been" do not suffice.
Owens falsely claims two historic blood libels are credible. In 1840, in Damascus, Syrian Jews were falsely charged with butchering Capuchin friar Thomas, an Italian monk living in Damascus. The Capuchins in Damascus spread the charge, which resulted in 63 Jewish children being abducted from their families to force the families to divulge the location of the friar’s blood. A Jewish barber named Solomon Negrin was arbitrarily arrested and tortured until a “confession” was extorted from him. Under torture, Negrin said that seven Jews killed the monk in the house of David Harari. The seven men were subsequently arrested and also tortured, with two dying under torture.
In Austria-Hungary in 1882, Jews were accused of murdering and beheading a 14-year-old Catholic girl named Eszter Solymosi. A girl’s body was found on the bank of the Tisza River, but though dressed in Eszter’s clothes, it was not Eszter—and if it was, it proved the charges libelous, as there was no injury to her neck. Nevertheless, members of the local Jewish community were accused of having killed Eszter for ritual purposes, as it happened right before Passover, based on the centuries-old false charge that Jews use Christians’ blood to bake matzah, the unleavened Passover bread. Eventually, after 15 months of investigation, the Hungarian Highest Court (Kúria), in a unanimous verdict, acquitted all the accused.
Owens repeats these blood libels, which did not historically happen. Perpetuating them does terrible harm. Owens’ rhetoric violates Exodus 20:16 ("You shall not bear false witness") in the most lethal sense. By reviving a lie that has historically led to the murder of innocent Jewish neighbors, it creates a "false report" (Exodus 23:1) that incites hatred.
Israel a “Demonic State”
“I’m talking about Israel. So let's stop making that a taboo subject because they've gone 'mask off.' Everything they're doing is demonic. I want nothing to do with it. … I don't care. Please write your articles. You’ve already written them all. I don't know what you could add about me. But I do not support Israel, and I don't think that Jewish Americans should support Israel. I hope that they're now having those conversations. I see many of them recognizing that they have been propagandized into believing they have to support this demonic state."
Source: Tucker Carlson, “Candace Owens: Macron, Harvey Weinstein, and Why ‘Christ Is King’ Totally Broke People’s Brains,” The Tucker Carlson Show, Aug 1, 2025, https://youtube.com/watch?v=gTz51gPkG4Q (accessed Dec 24, 2025).
“I’m so sick of Israel and those who pretend its actions are normal or even remotely justifiable. This country has a bloodlust like no other. Have an issue with this tweet? I literally do not care. Think defending Israel’s demonic actions is going to guarantee you a spot in heaven? Double your indulgences and sign your offspring up to die for Netanyahu. Leave the rest of us the hell alone.”
Source: Candace Owens, @RealCandaceO, X post, Jun 13, 2025, https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/1933344264383078773?s=20
Context: Demonization of Israel. Using the term "demonic" moves beyond political criticism into metaphysical dehumanization. It portrays the Jewish State not as a democracy with flawed policies and diverse opinions, but as an embodiment of absolute evil. This aligns with the IHRA example of "using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis."
Claiming Jews Enslaved Black Americans
“I challenge black Americans to wake up to your true history because your quarrel is not with white men. … Wake up and learn the true history of slavery. Because that wasn't exactly a white-men sport, okay? Jewish people were the ones that were trading us. Jewish people were in control of the slave trade. They've buried a lot of it, but it's there and you can find it.”
Source: Candace Owens, “Candace Ep 283," YouTube, December 19, 2025, https://youtube.com/live/w1oqQbR_bYs (accessed Jan 1, 2026).
“Jews enslaved black people. You can say sorry or you can stfu [shut the f*** up] about it.”
Source: Candace Owens, X post, Dec 21, 2025, https://x.com/realcandaceo/status/2002503192630980863
Context: Candace Owens is the Louis Farrakhan of our time, repeating the lies from the Nation of Islam's book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews that the Jews secretly ran the Transatlantic Slave Trade ("They've buried a lot of it, but it's there and you can find it"). Historical records prove that, while a few Jews did profit, they were a tiny minority of participants and did not "control" the slave trade. The vast system was actually dominated by Christian European empires, who relied on Muslim merchant networks and African tribal leaders to capture and sell the enslaved people.
Claiming Israel “shot JFK” and controls America
"I don't think we've been a sovereign nation since they shot JFK. And when I say 'they,' people online say, 'What do you mean by they?' I'm talking about Israel. I don’t want you guys to like, read in between the [lines]—I’m talking about Israel. So let's stop making that a taboo subject because they've gone mask off. Everything they're doing is demonic.”
Source: Tucker Carlson, “Candace Owens: Macron, Harvey Weinstein, and Why ‘Christ Is King’ Totally Broke People’s Brains,” The Tucker Carlson Show, Aug 1, 2025, https://youtube.com/watch?v=gTz51gPkG4Q (accessed Dec 24, 2025).
Context: Myth of Jewish World Conspiracy. This statement explicitly accuses the Jewish State of assassinating a U.S. President and secretly controlling the American government ("we haven't been a sovereign nation"). This revives the Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery, alleging a secret Jewish cabal controls world events and subverts foreign governments. False Witness (Exodus 20:16) and implies collective guilt. To accuse Israel of assassinating a head of state without verifiable proof is a violation of the 9th Commandment. It is a "malicious lie" intended to breed hatred and fear, violating the Christian command to "put away all malice and all deceit" (1 Peter 2:1).
Dennis Prager's Letter to Candace Owens
Owen's formerly worked for Jewish conservative thought leader Dennis Prager. After her public antisemitism, Prager wrote a letter to Owen's expressing kind but deep concern. The letter is worth reading in its entirety and covers Prager's insightful thoughts on Owen's false claims in greater depth.
On September 4, 2024, I sent this letter to Candace Owens regarding many comments she has made about Jews, Zionism and Israel. I have known Candace for about as long as she has been in public life. She began her podcasting at PragerU in 2019 and left in 2021. She left on very good terms. To this day, she often speaks of her respect and love for Marissa Streit, CEO of PragerU, and me.
Within hours of receiving my letter, Candace replied:
“I deeply appreciate this e-mail and I will respond to it thoroughly. Please know that I respect you tremendously and it is difficult for me to reconcile how I feel about you and Marissa and the amazing way in which I was treated by you both, and my new feelings and understanding about Zionism. Please give me a bit of time to respond to all of your points. You can always reach out to me and no matter which side of this or any political debate we wind up on, my love and respect for you and Marissa and your treatment of me will never be swayed.”
As it happens, more than two weeks later, Candace had not responded to the letter. Given the number of subjects covered, the letter’s length, and Candace’s busy family life and career, I did not expect her to. I sent it to Candace to give her the chance to respond and because I did not want her to first see it when it went public.
Last week, after not hearing from her, I emailed Candace that I would be publishing the letter. We then spoke on the phone, she briefly explained why she hadn't been able to respond in writing, and she in no way objected to my making the letter public.
I wish I did not have to write this letter. But Candace has said many things that need to be answered. The primary reasons I have not spoken out sooner are that I needed to become fully acquainted with all or nearly all the things she has said about Jews, Zionism, and Israel, make sure I quoted her accurately, and that I never did so out of context. That was time-consuming work.
I ask anyone who has been influenced by Candace with regard to Jews, Israel, and Zionism to make the effort to read this entire letter. If you care about truth, I believe you have a moral obligation to do so.
Dennis Prager
Tucker Carlson
Christian Political Commentator. Born 1969. Host of the Tucker Carlson Show after his termination from Fox News in 2023.
Veteran media host Tucker Carlson is the most sophisticated and dangerous antisemite of the three named. Rarely stating conclusions himself, he provides platform and permission for others to draw them. He has the largest capital of public trust with significant political connections and is responsible for legitimizing the previously shunned Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes in the Christian Conservative movement.
With his massive platform, he continues to host ever more extreme voices—critical of Jews or Israel—challenging others to disavow him for antisemitism and thereby risk loosing his connections and fracture the Right politically. Increasing numbers have fallen prey to his compromise and moral capture.
🏆 Named "Antisemite of the Year" for 2025 by StopAntisemitism, for normalizing antisemitism by "platforming and praising Holocaust revisionists and Nazi apologists, while hiding behind irony and plausible deniability... By legitimizing extremist voices and weaponizing conspiratorial imagery at a massive scale, he has helped drag antisemitic ideas back into the mainstream.”
__
Mainstreaming White-Supremacist Nick Fuentes
Carlson has moved from dog-whistling to explicitly platforming America's most notorious white supremacist and avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes without significant pushback or cross-exam, treating his views as valid conservative critique. (See Fuentes' views below.) The interview's structure—biographical anecdotes, laughter, and mutual compliments—painted Fuentes as a relatable underdog. Carlson admits, "You're clearly ascendant, you're enormously talented, you're more talented than I am, for sure, as a talker. There have been a lot of attempts to silence you and it hasn't worked.” Carlson preempts criticism by claiming journalistic duty. “I'm willing to take that risk … Everyone's going to be like, ‘But you're a Nazi just like Fuentes.’ Okay. But then, I don't think Fuentes is going away. Ben Shapiro tried to strangle him in the crib in college, and now he's bigger than ever.”
The result is a two-hour, largely unchallenged monologue where Tucker "laundered" Fuentes' racist views as more normal and mainstream than they are. For a figure with Carlson's reach and experience, this is no naive oversight. Carlson knows how to conduct an adversarial, critical interview, as he had notoriously done previously against Senator Ted Cruz, vehemently attacking Cruz’ Christian support for Israel. Nick Fuentes himself had publicly mocked Carlson’s interview with Cruz as a transparent hatchet job.
[Fuentes:] "This [Cruz interview] was an ambush by a propagandist. And I think that is literally, by definition, what Tucker Carlson is. I think he is a propagandist, and you know, because when Tucker Carlson agrees with the guest, it's all softballs. The questions are, ‘Why are you so awesome? Why are you so honest? Why are you so brave?’ These kind of rhetorical flourishes, loaded up with sarcasm about how anybody that disagrees with the guest is an idiot—when [Tucker] agrees—when it's Dave Smith, when it's Daryl Cooper. … And when Tucker doesn't agree—when it's someone like Ted Cruz or previous guests that he has had on before—then you get condescension, you get an ambush! You get kind of a line of questioning which is really maybe unfair. You got constant interruptions. You get a general air of contempt. And that's obviously what we saw with Ted Cruz. Now again, I think it is good for us. ... I think it’s a good thing. I agree with the general thrust of what Tucker was saying, and with what he was doing. I guess I’m just being a little picky, and I’m saying, when people say, ‘This is journalism’—let’s not get it twisted. This is not journalism.”
Sources: Tucker Carlson, "Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes," The Tucker Carlson Show, YouTube, October 27, 2025, https://youtube.com/watch?v=efBB0D4tf1Y (accessed January 14, 2026). Tucker Carlson, "Tucker Confronts Ted Cruz on His Support for Regime Change in Iran," The Tucker Carlson Show, YouTube, June 18, 2025, https://youtube.com/watch?v=smemFVe0l5E (accessed January 15, 2026). Nick Fuentes, America First, clip from X post, Jun 20, 2025, https://x.com/Awesome_Jew_/status/1935849941039300710 (accessed, January 15, 2026).
“I think he [Nick Fuentes] is primarily successful because of his talents, and because of the obvious truth behind some of what he is saying, which is true, right? The government of this country, or any country, should act on behalf of its own citizens, and ours doesn't, and that's an outrage. So, okay, that's just true.”
Source: Tucker Carlson, “Tucker Carlson: Rise of Nick Fuentes, Paramount vs Netflix, Anti-AI Sentiment, Hottest Takes,” All-In Podcast, YouTube, Dec 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY5UFw2AIZo (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: By stating there is "obvious truth" in Fuentes' claim that the government fails to serve its own citizens, Carlson validates the specific conspiracy theory Fuentes is famous for: that a "Zionist Occupied Government" (ZOG) prioritizes Jewish/Israeli interests over American interests. This legitimizes the accusation that Jewish citizens or supporters of Israel are disloyal to their own nation. To praise the "talent" and partial "truth" of a known antisemite is to provide cover for hatred. Biblical truth is holistic; one cannot extract political truisms to justify a messenger who spreads malice.
Historical Revisionism and Holocaust Distortion
Carlson introduced Holocaust revisionist Darryl Cooper to his show: “I think you are the most important popular historian working in the United States today. … I'm a fan of yours because of the way you treat history, which is with relentless curiosity and honesty. … I want people to know who you are, and I want you to be widely recognized as the most important historian in the United States, because I think that you are.”
Darryl Cooper: “Winston Churchill was the chief villain of the Second World War… he was primarily responsible for that war becoming what it did. Becoming something other than an invasion of Poland.”
Cooper about Hitler’s regime: “When they went into the east in 1941 they launched a war where they were completely unprepared to deal with the millions and millions of prisoners of war, of local political prisoners and so forth, that they were going to have to handle, and they went in with no plan for that. They just threw these people into camps and millions of people ended up dead there.”
Context: Misrepresentation and Holocaust Distortion. Darryl Cooper is not an actual historian and for Carlson to call for him “to be widely recognized as the most important historian in the United States” was borderline duplicitous. Unlike real academics, Cooper made no effort to correct his credentials. Carlson promoting an amateur on his large platform, claiming the Nazis "just threw these people into camps" due to poor planning rather than genocidal intent, is a form of soft denial that rehabilitates the image of the perpetrators. Endorsing a lie about the mass murder of millions violates the 9th Commandment. It also fails the test of Romans 12:9 ("Abhor what is evil; cling to what is good") by morally inverting the roles of the aggressor (Hitler) and the victim, sowing confusion rather than truth.
Carlson: "You had this country, Germany, a sophisticated cultural superpower that was fine. And then they all turned into demons for a few years, and now they're fine again. That’s sort of the official story. And I think deep down, we all know that makes no sense."
After Cooper presented his view of WWII, including that Churchill was the chief villain (a greater villain than Hitler or Stalin) and that Nazi concentration camps were effectively accidental, Carlson concludes: “All of your conclusions are consistent with mine.”
Context: Holocaust Distortion. By disparaging verified history of the Nazi era as a sudden, inexplicable "turning into demons" and then endorsing an amateur (Darryl Cooper) as a real historian who claims the camps were merely the result of poor logistics (not intent), Carlson mainstreams Holocaust revisionism. This mocks the reality of sin and evil. The Holocaust was not a mysterious accident; it was the calculated industrialization of death. Denying this reality violates Proverbs 24:11 ("Rescue those being led away to death") by retroactively excusing the executioners.
Source: Tucker Carlson, "Darryl Cooper: The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe," Tucker Carlson, YouTube, September 2, 2024, https://youtu.be/vOTgPEGYS2o (accessed January 16, 2026).
Whitewashing Hamas as a Mere Political Organization
[Guest:] “When you talk about resistance, this all started with Hamas. So for the most part, I would say they're a resistance movement. They're simply people fighting for their people, trying to protect their land.” [Cut to Carlson, who visibly nods.] … [Carlson:] “Are they, I mean, I'm sure you've dealt with Hamas or know people who are, right? Are they religious fanatics? Are they jihadis?” [Guest:] “Not the people that I know.”
Source: Agapia Stephanopoulos, The Tucker Carlson Show, YouTube, August 11, 2025, https://youtu.be/y79CfG2R_3g (accessed January 14, 2026).
“[They claim] that Hamas is a group of jihadis, [that] they're Islamic extremists—which they also claim, constantly—which I don't know if that's true, by the way. It seems more like a political organization, but whatever. They're telling us constantly they're al-Qaeda.”
Source: Tucker Carlson, The Tucker Carlson Show, Youtube, September 5, 2025, https://youtu.be/GTNIHSpqB4M (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: In previous years (2006-2008), Carlson had no difficulty seeing Hamas as a terrorist group and knowing the difference between legitimate political resistance and terrorism, making statements like: "Post 9/11, I mean, aren't we in an age where we have to draw clear distinctions between legitimate political resistance and terrorism?" "I think Hamas is repulsive." "... a terror group, Hamas, whatever." Hamas was founded as the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a vast global Islamist network pursuing long-term sharia revival and caliphate-like governance. It shares ideological foundations with al-Qaeda and ISIS through figures like Abdullah Azzam (the "father of global jihad," who mentored bin Laden and backed Hamas's early years) and Sayyid Qutb, whose writings shaped doctrines of violent Islamism. Although Hamas prioritizes the Palestinian conflict, its 1988 founding charter frames it as part of a universal jihad. Post-October 7, 2023, atrocities—mass killings, rapes, and beheadings with documented glee—have drawn expert parallels to ISIS brutality in scale and ideological justification, underscoring Hamas's deep jihadist commitment beyond politics.
Covering Up the Antisemitism of Ye (Kanye West)
Before anyone knew how crazed an antisemite Ye (formerly Kanye West) had become, Tucker Carlson did a long-format, positive interview with Ye on Fox News, in October 2022. It was later revealed in leaked, unaired footage that Carlson's team had strategically edited out numerous antisemitic remarks and bizarre theories to make West appear more coherent and "launder" his antisemitic views into more socially acceptable conservative talking points.
The outtakes included antisemitic tropes of Jewish control over finances, that black people are the "real" Jews and suggested that Jewish people are trying to "steal" this birthright. Ye compared Black people judging each other to "a Jewish person judging another Jewish person on how good they danced," then asked producers to "edit that out,” and several other bizarre comments.
Despite the disturbing nature of the unedited footage, Carlson initially presented the interview as a landmark of honest speech, “We’ve rarely heard a man speak so honestly and so movingly about what he believes. But again, you can judge for yourself. Here it is.” He ended the interview, stating “Kanye West. Ye! Not crazy. Worth listening to.”
Sources: Tucker Carlson Tonight, “A Tucker Carlson Interview with Ye West,” Fox Nation, Oct 6/7, 2022. Anna Merlan, “Watch the Disturbing Kanye Interview Clips That Tucker Carlson Didn’t Put on Air,” Vice News, Oct 11, 2022, https://vice.com/en/article/kanye-west-tucker-carlson-leaked-footage-antisemitism-fake-children (accessed Jan 15, 2026).
Claiming the Israeli Government Is Intentionally Genocidal
“The idea of blood guilt, because that's what he's describing there, you should be killed by virtue of who your parents are, who your grandparents were, by virtue of how you were born. You should be killed. You don't have a right to live. You're guilty because you were born, which, of course, leads to collective punishment and genocide. That's the basis of genocide, right there, that attitude. That was considered totally un-Christian and un-American because it is. And if someone said something like that on television, I mean, he'd be probably pulled off the air for that. You should kill kids because you don't like their parents. That is their attitude. That's the Israeli government's attitude, well-documented attitude.”
Source: Tucker Carlson, The Tucker Carlson Show, Apple Podcasts, November 13, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-tucker-carlson-show/id1719657632?i=1000736534325 (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: The demonstrably false claim that the Israeli administration intentionally kills children based on blood lineage is a malicious inversion of reality, as the IDF operates under strict ethical codes to minimize civilian casualties, while the accusation projects the actual genocidal intent of Hamas—whose founding charter explicitly calls for killing all Jews—onto the Jewish state. This rhetoric blatantly violates the IHRA definition by reviving the ancient "Blood Libel"—the myth that Jews maliciously murder children—and engaging in "Holocaust Inversion" to falsely equate the Jewish State with Nazism; biblically, this is a gross violation against bearing false witness and commits the abomination found in Proverbs 17:15, condemning the righteous while shielding the wicked.
Kirk Eulogy: Eating Hummus in Jerusalem, “Why don’t we just kill him?”
“It actually reminds me of my favorite story ever. So it’s about 2,000 years ago in Jerusalem, and Jesus shows up, and he starts talking about the people in power, and he starts doing the worst thing that you can do, which is telling the truth about people, and they hate it. And they just go bonkers. They hate it. And they become obsessed with making him stop. ‘This guy’s got to stop talking. We’ve got to shut this guy up.’ And I can just sort of picture the scene in a lamplit room with a bunch of guys sitting around eating hummus, thinking about what do we do about this guy telling the truth about us? ‘We must make him stop talking.’ And there’s always one guy with a bright idea, and I can just hear him say, ‘I’ve got an idea. Why don’t we just kill him? That’ll shut him up. That’ll fix the problem.’”
Source: Tucker Carlson, Speech at Charlie Kirk’s Memorial in Glendale, Arizona, Sep 21, 2025, YouTube, Sep 22, 2025, https://youtu.be/zfI-JZEBNss (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: By itself, this biblical story could be completely innocent. In context, it is quite troubling. Already in November 2023, Tucker Carlson had begun defending Candace Owens against charges of antisemitism with a long-format interview. On Sep 10, 2025, conservative leader Charlie Kirk—a known defender of Israel and personal acquaintance of Benjamin Netanyahu—was assassinated. The following day (Sep 11), a radical left-wing trans-activist was apprehended after a mass manhunt, and the murder weapon recovered. The suspect confessed involvement to his family and his DNA was found on the weapon, which the suspect admitted was his.
Both Carlson and Owens knew Charlie Kirk. Kirk had remained personal friends with Owens, but cut professional ties because of her growing antisemitism, which Kirk labeled “brain rot” and “demonic.” Almost immediately after the assasination, Candace Owens began questioning the official narrative, and within a week (Sep 17), she expressed shocking allegations, heavily implying Israeli involvement in his murder. She claimed Kirk was targeted because he had begun expressing doubts about U.S. support for Israel.
That same day (Sep 17), Carlson attacked Netanyahu’s public eulogy for Kirk, calling him a “liar” and the prime minister’s eulogy "disgusting." Then, Candace Owens (who was not slated to give a eulogy) refused to attend the Arizona memorial, stating she was concerned about “the feds” organizing the memorial. “They want us to stop investigating the death of Charlie Kirk. I am convinced that this is a full-blown fed operation.”
It is in this context that Tucker Carlson gave his eulogy on September 21, comparing Kirk’s assassination to the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. He explicitly alluded to a conspiracy in Jerusalem where "guys sitting around eating hummus" plotted to kill someone for telling the truth about those in power. The comments were widely interpreted as an endorsement of alleged Israeli involvement in Kirk’s killing. The eulogy was even more troubling against the backdrop of historic Christian antisemitism and violence perpetrated against Jews collectively for the crucifixion.
Afterwards, Carlson denied meaning anything in particular by it, “Since when is hummus Jewish? It’s an Arab food." Sabra (a kosher, Jewish, Israeli brand) is widely considered the most famous and dominant brand of hummus in America. Clips have since surfaced of Tucker previously connecting Israel specifically to hummus in his verbiage, “I’m not interested in boycotting Israel. I'm happy to keep buying the hummus.”
Declaring "Christian Zionism" a Heresy and "Brain Virus."
Carlson is willing to use his Christianity in his rhetoric, “That's non-Christian. That's totally incompatible with Christianity. … it's against my Christian faith … I'm offended by that as a Christian.” In his interview with the white-supremacist Fuentes, he also attacked fellow Christians who support Israel, using language that pathologizes their faith and questions their allegiance to Christianity:
"[Mike] Huckabee, Ted Cruz ... all people I know personally who I've seen be seized by this brain virus, and they're not Jewish. Most of them are self-described Christians. And then the Christian Zionists who are, well, Christian Zionists. Like—what is that? I can just say for myself, I dislike them more than anybody. Because what? Because it's Christian heresy, and I'm offended by that as a Christian. That's why."
Context: Carlson categorically calls Christian convictions about support for Israel a “brain virus,” and “Christian heresy” which offends him as a Christian. He dislikes them “more than anybody.” It can be fairly estimated that around 400 million Protestant Evangelicals hold this view, well over half of them in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Some are dispensationalist, while others are not. 2023 Pew research even indicates that around 37% of American Catholics believe that God gave the Land of Israel to the Jewish people.
Meanwhile, Carlson has repeatedly stated that “I’m not an expert. I’m not a theologian,” confessing, “I’m coming from total ignorance. My father is not a preacher, to put it mildly.” He admits that, while he grew up as a baptized Christian, “I always feel guilty talking about Christianity because I am such a bad Christian … I lived in a secular world my whole life and had very secular attitudes, and I still do in some ways.” Carlson only started reading through the Bible for the first time in 2023 (in the New Living Translation), an experience he recommends, but he holds that “[forgiveness is] not the message of the Old Testament,” expressing discomfort and being “pretty shocked” by it.
Sources (all accessed Jan 18, 2026): Bryce Crawford, "Bryce Crawford Interviews Tucker Carlson (EP 174)," Bryce Crawford Podcast, YouTube, Jan 6, 2026, https://youtu.be/NefVYU_dKQo. Gerald R. McDermott (Editor), The New Christian Zionism: Fresh Perspectives on Israel and the Land (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016), https://amazn.so/15XQH9Y. Megyn Kelly, "The Spiritual and the Supernatural - Tucker Carlson on God, Surviving a Demon Attack, and UFOs," Megyn Kelly, YouTube, Nov 6, 2025, https://youtu.be/OtUOzZUm6bI. Pew Research Center, "Religion and Politics: Contention and Consensus," Pew Research Center, July 24, 2003, http://pewrsr.ch/10OJ0yG. Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson, YouTube, July 16, 2024, https://youtu.be/zaFNktRoTbo. Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson, YouTube, Aug 25, 2025, https://youtu.be/KI9sn4esE84. Tucker Carlson, "Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes," The Tucker Carlson Show, YouTube, Oct 27, 2025, https://youtu.be/efBB0D4tf1Y.
On Supporting Candace Owens' Rhetoric
"In order to be a good person, you must denounce this person [Candace Owens]? Obviously, I'm never going to. I would die before I played along with that. I don't know anyone who's saying that who has the moral authority to compel me. I don't know anyone saying that who has any moral authority at all."
Source: Tucker Carlson, "Tucker’s Fiery Response When Asked to Disavow Candace Owens," Tucker Carlson Network, YouTube, Nov 13, 2025, https://youtu.be/vl_8kXCRXvE (accessed Jan 18, 2026).
Disloyal Neocons, the Israel Lobby, and Private Ethnic Wars
The primary theory seemingly driving Tucker Carlson, and resonating with his audience, centers on claims of Jewish/Israeli dual loyalty and "neocons" wielding undue influence in Washington. Once a self-proclaimed supporter of Israel, Carlson now mainstreams narratives equating "neocons" with disloyal Jews who prioritize ethnic grudges and Israel over American interests. This rhetoric frames conflicts like the Ukraine war as private Jewish wars that harm the West and the Church.
In a pivotal 2022 interview, Carlson asked retired Colonel Douglas Macgregor to characterize Zelensky—a Jew whom Carlson has described as "sweaty and rat-like," "shifty," and a "persecutor of Christians." Macgregor responded that Zelensky "was picked and then blessed by Victoria Nuland and the State Department as their man," blaming U.S. interference rather than any Russian aggression.
When Carlson asked, "Who is Victoria Nuland?", Macgregor highlighted her relationships with Jewish figures Robert and Frederick Kagan and Antony Blinken. Macgregor stated: "These are the same people. Tony Blinken is in this... These are people with this agenda … in the case of Russia, Russia has special appeal because I think these people have ancestors who came from that region of the world and have a permanent ax to grind with the Russians—which, of course, I don't. I don't think most Americans do, and nor do I think anybody in government should shape policy based on whatever unhappiness their ancestors experienced in a place like Russia."
Macgregor effectively attributed the war to an Ashkenazi Jewish genetic vendetta. Rather than challenging this, Carlson asked why donors support the war. Macgregor replied: "Well, first of all, you've got to go through and identify the donors. What's their background? Where did they come from? And why do they feel the way they do? I think there are more personal issues here than we realize with many of them."
Macgregor—platformed by Calrson—is driven by deep antisemitism, stating elsewhere: “President Trump would not be in the White House today if it were not for wealthy Jewish billionaires allied with their friend Netanyahu ... They want global financial hegemony. The United States is simply a tool in their toolbox ... President Netanyahu ... represents Jewish international power and capital ... This is a microcosm of everything that's wrong now in the United States... The people that are wealthy ... are, as the Russians used to call certain individuals many, many years ago, ‘rootless cosmopolitans’” (a well-known Soviet slur for Jews).
Normalizing the view that "neocons" hijack U.S. policy, Carlson has stated: “It's about not letting any other foreign country run your country. You can't have that." He told a TP USA crowd: "There are a lot of Americans who've served in the IDF. They should lose their citizenship."
Carlson frequently endorses Dave Smith, who (relying on Mearsheimer and Walt’s 2007 book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy) argues pro-Israel groups like AIPAC and "neocons" push Middle East wars to "remake the Middle East" for Netanyahu at U.S. expense. Columnist Coleman Hughes effectively debunked these theories in a October 2025 debate, dismantling Smith's claim that the Israel lobby drove the U.S. into the Iraq War, citing evidence that Ariel Sharon advised against invasion, lobby spending was minimal (comparable to the dentists' lobby), and neoconservative plans mismatched Israeli priorities.
Carlson links U.S. policy toward Israel with destroying Christian communities in Israel, Gaza, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon: "all places where U.S. foreign policy clutchers at the behest of Israel see the destruction of Christian communities." He adds, "I'm guessing that's not an accident. I don't believe in collective punishment unlike some other countries like Israel, which is big on collective punishment." He asks: "Why do American Christian churches send money to a government [Israel] that does this to Christians?" As many have pointed out, these unfounded claims obscure the reality that the only place historic Christian communities grow in the Middle East are areas under Israeli control. The major driver behind Christian oppression and decline throughout the Middle East is fundamentalist Islam (including in places under Muslim Palestinian control, like Bethlehem).
By platforming all these views without pushback, Carlson legitimizes the notion that Jewish "neocons" exert undue control, fueling disloyalty tropes, and framing U.S. wars as ethnic vendettas costing American blood and treasure, angering his American conservative audience.
Sources (all accessed Jan 16, 2026): Coleman Hughes and The Free Press, "Dave Smith vs. Coleman Hughes Debate: Israel and U.S. Foreign Policy," YouTube, Oct 4, 2025, https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZR0sCe6yDuM. Israel Advocacy Movement, "Tucker Carlson Is Worse Than You Think," YouTube, Sep 9, 2025, https://youtube.com/watch?v=JuSzjwtLaGM. Tucker Carlson, "An attempted assassination, followed by a coup. It makes you wonder what’s next. Dave Smith has some ideas," X, August 13, 2024, https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1823404757505163322. Tucker Carlson, "Dave Smith on how neocons wrecked the country," X, May 16, 2024, https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1791184844916953553.
Tucker Carlson, "Dave Smith on the Douglas Murray debate and how he came to find God," X, May 12, 2025, https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1922060839449985360. Tucker Carlson, "Ep. 18 Into the abyss: Colonel Douglas Macgregor tells us why the Ukraine war must end now," X, Aug 21, 2023, https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1693761723230990509.
Nick Fuentes
Christian White Supremacists. Born 1998. Host of America First, founder of the Alt-Right "Groyper" movement, avowed Holocaust denier, self-described sexist and admirer of both Hitler and Stalin.
__
Why Is Hitler Cool?
“And I was thinking, what is it about Hitler that's cool? Why does it tickle? Because kids love Hitler, kids love Hitler. Young men see the edits. It's edgy, it's transgressive. It's—something that feels naughty and dark about it, but there's also something electrifying about it. … Why is Hitler cool? I'll tell you why very simply. Because what Hitler represents is if white people didn't give a f***. That's what it represents.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, America First, Dec 8, 2025, streamed on Rumble, https://tinyurl.com/5xnnttem (accessed Jan 1, 2026).
Context: Glorification of Nazism. Openly admiring the aesthetics and figurehead of the Nazi regime falls under the umbrella of justifying or glorifying the Holocaust and its perpetrators. This is idolatry of power and evil. Admiring a regime defined by its hatred of the God of Israel and the Jewish people is fundamentally incompatible with the Spirit of Christ. It violates Psalm 97:10 ("Let those who love the Lord hate evil").
The “Jewish Problem”
"Jews run everything and they worship the devil … the problem is Jewish, Jewish—it's all together. It's all of them together. It's not just the Zionists. It's not just the people that really care about Israel. It's a lot of them, OK? And it's the ones that even aren’t too fond of Israel.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, America First, Jan 10, 2024, Telegram, https://tinyurl.com/56nmdmdt (accessed Jan 1, 2026).
Context: Myth of Jewish Power, Demonization, and Collective Guilt. This statement constitutes a severe violation of the IHRA definition of antisemitism by employing the Myth of Jewish Power ("run everything") and classic demonization ("worship the devil") to assign collective guilt to the entire Jewish people. This rhetoric is a sin against the Ninth Commandment ("You shall not bear false witness") as it spreads malicious, unverifiable lies. Furthermore, blaming "all of them together" rejects the Biblical standard of individual justice (Ezekiel 18:20), which forbids holding a collective group guilty for the perceived actions of individuals.
I’m Just Like Hitler
“I’m a misogynist … All I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory … I’m just like Hitler.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, America First livestream, February 2022, https://x.com/rightwingwatch/status/1490738194974920710 (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: Glorification of Nazism & Idolatry of Evil. This statement constitutes a blatant violation of the IHRA definition of antisemitism, as explicitly identifying with Hitler and calling for "Aryan victory" serves to glorify the Holocaust's primary perpetrator and promote Neo-Nazi ideology. Such rhetoric is spiritually repugnant, violating Psalm 97:10 ("Let those who love the Lord hate evil") by embracing a regime defined by racial hatred and genocide. Furthermore, the desire for "revenge" contravenes Romans 12:19 ("Vengeance is mine"), while the idolatry of racial supremacy mocks the biblical truth that all humanity is created in the Image of God.
White Supremacy & Shabbos Goy Race Traitor
“We can’t play this game of, ‘We disavow white supremacy.’ Notice how the claws come out. All these p*****s, frankly. And, again, sorry for the language but that’s what it is. People like, who’s this, Matt Walsh guy? Total f****t p***y. And he’s always like this. When a white person does a shooting, suddenly he’s a big tough guy. … Matt Walsh, shabbos goy race traitor. That’s what it is, folks. I know some people don’t like to use that expression, but it’s totally true—throwing his own people under the bus. He hates white people. Nobody else talks like that about their own people except for white people and it’s gross. … Yeah, OK, keep typing on Twitter dot com, f****t. F****t. P***y. Race traitor – you work for Jews, you know.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, America First (now-deleted), YouTube, August 5, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/4tzte9hn (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: Myth of Jewish Control & Idolatry of Race. Fuentes is utilizing severe profanity while claiming to be a Christian, including using "shabbos goy" as a slur and the accusation "you work for Jews" to allege that Jews secretly control public figures to advance an anti-white agenda. This rhetoric is a sinful manifestation of racial idolatry. Furthermore, the vile insults and promotion of racial enmity violate the clear prohibitions against slander (Ephesians 4:31) and the abomination of sowing discord (Proverbs 6:19).
Jewishness Is the Common Denominator
"As far as the Jews are concerned, I think that, like I said, you cannot actually divorce Israel and the neocons and all those things that you talk about from Jewishness, ethnicity, religion, identity. … They're a stateless people. They're unassimilable. They resist assimilation for thousands of years. And I think that's a good thing. And now they have this territory in Israel. There's a deep religious affection for the state. It's bound up in their identity ... They have this international community across borders, extremely organized, that is putting the interests of themselves before the interests of their home country. … I see Jewishness as the common denominator.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, "Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes," The Tucker Carlson Show, YouTube, October 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efBB0D4tf1Y (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: Fuentes deploys the "Dual Loyalty" trope, accusing Jews of being "unassimilable" and prioritizing international or Israeli interests over their home countries. Historically, this trope has served as a deadly pretext for persecution—from the Dreyfus Affair to the Holocaust—by falsely casting Jewish citizens as an untrustworthy "enemy within" to justify expulsions, stripping of rights, and genocide. Framing "Jewishness as the common denominator" for perceived political ills assigns collective guilt and maligns the entire Jewish community as inherently subversive. This violates the biblical prohibition, "You shall not circulate a false report" (Exodus 23:1).
Trump Is Owned by the Jews
“We can’t criticize organized Jewry in the United States? We can’t criticize the Jewish billionaire oligarchs that have bought the government? … Don't vote for Trump. He's owned by the Jews. He'll bring us to war in Iran. … I'm f***ing right. I'm right about Israel. I'm right about our Jewish oligarchy. I'm more right than anybody else.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, America First, “Ep. 1604,” Rumble, Nov 25, 2025, https://rumble.com/v728ye8-america-first-ep.-1604.html (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: The myth of "organized Jewry" or secret Jewish power, popularized by proven fabrications like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, has been the central engine of modern antisemitism, providing a false theory to blame Jews for global suffering and justify mass violence as "self-defense" against an imaginary oppressor. Fuentes alleges a "Jewish oligarchy" controls the U.S. government, employing the trope that has historically served as the central engine for justifying persecution and genocide. Biblically, this rhetoric is a severe violation of Exodus 23:1 ("You shall not raise a false report"), spreading malicious, unverified accusations against an entire people group.
Holocaust Denial "The Cookie Analogy"
“Max says if I take one hour to cook a batch of cookies, and Cookie Monster has 15 ovens, working 24 hours a day every day for 5 years, how long does it take Cookie Monster to make 6 million batches of cookies. I don’t know, that’s a good question. [Laughing] … O no, no! [Laughing]. It doesn’t really sound correct to me, wait a second … It certainly wouldn’t be 5 years, right. The math doesn’t seem to add up there. The math doesn’t seem to add up there. I don’t think you'd result in 6 million. Maybe 200,000–300,000 cookies, and I think the Red Cookie Association said something like that, 200,000–300,000 cookies baked—probably. And in addition, you know, in this hypothetical, I imagine, that if you took aerial photographs over the kitchens, you would need to see certain smokestacks to release the smoke from baking the cookies, and the smoke stacks would project certain shadows, but I guess they’re not visible in the aerial photographs taken over the kitchens. Moreover, if you look at the soil texture, it’s really not deep enough for mass cookie storage underground. And so there’s a lot of things, you know, in the cookie kitchens they say that the ovens are, uh, wooden and they have windows on them, and they’re not totally secure. And the ovens that they use, they actually did sort of an ad hoc use of that particular kind of oven—even though they made a perfectly good design for ovens for a different purpose, for delousing, I mean, you know, for something else. So, none of it really adds up, I don’t know, it just kind of doesn’t really make sense, this crazy cookie analogy … So 6 million cookies? Eh-eh, I don’t buy it.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, America First, livestream, January 11, 2019, https://x.com/CalebJHull/status/1189594371030695937 (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: The Holocaust denial claims embedded in this cookie analogy—such as understated crematoria capacities, absent aerial evidence of smokestacks or mass graves, and misrepresented gas chamber designs—are thoroughly debunked by historical evidence. As one of several death camps, Auschwitz's crematoria had a documented daily capacity for over 4,700 bodies, enabling the extermination of over a million victims, as corroborated by captured Nazi records, demographic studies, and survivor testimonies, while 1944 aerial photographs clearly show gas chamber vents and smokestacks, and the chambers were secure concrete structures built for mass murder, not delousing. These distortions mirror the revisionism of David Irving, whose similar assertions were rejected in the 2000 UK High Court libel trial as deliberate manipulations of evidence, affirming the gas chambers' role in killing hundreds of thousands. This judicial finding aligns with the authoritative consensus of the World Holocaust Remembrance Center, U.S. archives (NARA, holding millions of original documents on Nazi war crimes), the Nuremberg trials evidence, as well as Polish state museum research, which upholds the systematic murder of six million Jews based on exhaustive archival research and survivor accounts.
I’m a Fan of Stalin
“It's actually funny. It was December 18th. I remember because that's an important date to me. It's Joseph Stalin's birthday. I'm a fan. … I was an admirer. But we don't need to go into that.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, "Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes," The Tucker Carlson Show, YouTube, October 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efBB0D4tf1Y (accessed January 14, 2026).
Context: Justifying the Wicked. Fuentes glorifies a regime that aggressively persecuted Jewish culture, individuals, and the Jewish state (e.g., the "Doctor's Plot," "anti-cosmopolitan" and “anti-Zionism” campaigns), effectively serving as a dog-whistle for the elimination of "Zionist" influence. Biblically, admiring a mass murderer violates Proverbs 17:15 ("He who justifies the wicked... is an abomination to the Lord") and betrays a sinful idolatry of power that rejects God's command to defend the vulnerable (Isaiah 1:17) rather than celebrate their oppressors.
No Place in Western Civilization
“Jews have no place in Western civilization because they are not Christian.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, debate on Alex Jones’ InfoWars, May 2021, as reported by multiple sources (Truth Or Fiction, AJC, Israel Hayom, accessed January 14, 2026).
On the West’s Judeo-Christian Heritage
“We want a Christian society. No prefix, no suffix. We want Christ.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, Telegram post, Jan 16, 2022, https://t.me/nickjfuentes/5124 (accessed Jan 14, 2026).
White Christian America & Jews
“We’ve got to make America a Christian nation again. And you can understand why influential Jewish people in conservative media are not really gung-ho about that. They’re not promoting white identity. They’re not promoting this. And I don’t think they’re thrilled about the idea of revanchist Christianity. They like the idea of Christianity where we’re all Zionists and we’re all giving money to Israel and this and that, but they’re not really thrilled with just Christianity. They want it to be Judeo-Christianity. They want there to be this acknowledgement and, if we want America to be put first, and if we want to do the right thing by God, I don’t know that there can be a lot of compromise there.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, America First, livestream, February 2022 (documented on https://tinyurl.com/226p2ewv, accessed January 14, 2026).
The Most Christian Century in History
“I love you, and I love Hitler. … We are being held hostage as a country, and as a people, and as an entire generation by a small minority that doesn't even share our values. … We want this century to be the most Christian century in the history of human earth.”
Source: Nick Fuentes, “Fuentes Rally,” National Harbor, Maryland, March 4, 2023 (documented on https://tinyurl.com/38bz9yyh, accessed Jan 14, 2026).
Context: Demonization & Historic Persecution. The above statements regarding Jews and Western civilization violates the IHRA definition by deploying the antisemitic trope that Jews are inherently incompatible with Western society to justify their exclusion and discrimination. By declaring they have "no place," the speaker dehumanizes the Jewish community and incites a purge of Jewish citizens, echoing the logic used to justify centuries of expulsions and ghettoization. Historically, this theology fueled centuries of Christian antisemitism and ghettoization where "defending Christendom" became a pretext for torturing and murdering Jewish neighbors. It's also a false history that denies the outsized contribution the Jewish people have made to Western history, culture, and political thought. Such hatred mocks the biblical call to truth and the command to love the sojourner (Leviticus 19:34); it rejects the example of the Good Samaritan and the Jewish Messiah who taught it.
Video Examples
While the above evidence is much more extensive and sourced, the following videos contain a few examples and clips that illustrate the context and rhetoric of Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Nick Fuentes.